Subversion 1.9.10 up for testing/signing

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
8 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Subversion 1.9.10 up for testing/signing

Julian Foad-5
The 1.9.10 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
Please get the tarballs from
  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
and add your signatures there.

Thanks!

--
- Julian
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Subversion 1.9.10 up for testing/signing

Branko Čibej
On 07.01.2019 13:46, Julian Foad wrote:
> The 1.9.10 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
>   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there.


Do we always create tarballs from a branch export instead of the tag export?

$ diff -u tag-1.9.10/tools/backup/hot-backup.py.in subversion-1.9.10/tools/backup/hot-backup.py.in
--- tag-1.9.10/tools/backup/hot-backup.py.in 2016-03-15 05:00:40.000000000 +0100
+++ subversion-1.9.10/tools/backup/hot-backup.py.in 2016-03-15 05:00:40.000000000 +0100
@@ -28,8 +28,8 @@
 #    under the License.
 # ====================================================================
 
-# $HeadURL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/tags/1.9.10/tools/backup/hot-backup.py.in $
-# $LastChangedDate: 2016-03-15 05:00:40 +0100 (Tue, 15 Mar 2016) $
+# $HeadURL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/1.9.x/tools/backup/hot-backup.py.in $
+# $LastChangedDate: 2016-03-15 04:00:40 +0000 (Tue, 15 Mar 2016) $
 # $LastChangedBy: svn-role $
 # $LastChangedRevision: 1735016 $


The former is an svn-export from the 1.9.10 tag, the latter is from the
unpacked tarball. I understand the difference in the time zone but I
don't know why our release script exports from the branch, not from the
tag? I'd sort of call that a bug ...

-- Brane

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Subversion 1.9.10 up for testing/signing

Branko Čibej
In reply to this post by Julian Foad-5
Summary:

    +1 to release (Unix)

Verified:

  - Tarball contents and signatures
  - check ((fsfs, bdb) × (local, svnserve, dav))
  - check-all-javahl
  - check-swig-py
  - check-swig-rb
  - check-swig-pl

New issues:

  - 'make check-javahl' has become more verbose, printing this in every test:

        WARNING in native method: JNI call made without checking
        exceptions when required to from CallObjectMethodV

    Not a release blocker but quite distracting.

Known issues:

  - 'make check-swig-py' requires 'make install install-swig-py'.
  - 'make check-swig-rb' requires 'make install install-swig-rb'.

Platform

    macOS Mojave 10.14.2

    Standard dependencies:
      Apple LLVM version 10.0.0 (clang-1000.11.45.5)
      ruby 2.3.7p456 (2018-03-28 revision 63024)
      Python 2.7.10
      Cyrus SASL 2.1.26

    Dependencies from Homebrew:
      APR 1.6.5
      APR-Util 1.6.1
      httpd 2.4.37
      SQLite 3.26.0
      Serf 1.3.9
      OpenSSL 1.0.2q
      zlib 1.2.11
      BDB 18.1.25
      Perl 5.28.0

    Other dependencies:
      Java 1.8.0_191
      JUnit 4.11

    Built-in dependencies:
      utf8proc

GPG signatures committed to the dist/dev/subversion repository.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Subversion 1.9.10 up for testing/signing

Branko Čibej
On 08.01.2019 20:19, Branko Čibej wrote:
> New issues:
>
>   - 'make check-javahl' has become more verbose, printing this in every test:
>
>         WARNING in native method: JNI call made without checking
>         exceptions when required to from CallObjectMethodV

Most of these seem to have been fixed in 1.10.4 (which I tested with the
same version of Java as 1.9.10), and 1.11.1 with Java 11 doesn't report
any. So all this verbosity seems to be just a side effect of new checks
and warnings in newer Java (patch) releases, not anything that happened
on the branch.

-- Brane

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Subversion 1.9.10 up for testing/signing

Johan Corveleyn-3
In reply to this post by Julian Foad-5
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 1:46 PM Julian Foad <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> The 1.9.10 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
>   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> - Julian

Summary
-------
+1 to release

Platform
--------
Windows 7 SP1 (x64)
Microsoft Visual Studio 2013

Verified
--------
Signature, sha1 and sha512 for subversion-1.9.10.zip.

Contents of subversion-1.9.10.zip are identical to tags/1.9.10, and
to branches/1.9.x@1850359 (except for expected differences in svn_version.h
and svnpubsub, svnwcsub and nominate.pl (symlinks vs. file contents), and
generated files).

Tested
------
[ Release build ] x [ fsfs ] x [ file | svn | http ]

Results
-------
All tests pass.

Dependencies
------------
Httpd 2.4.16
Apr 1.5.2
Apr-Util 1.5.4
OpenSSL 1.0.2k
Serf 1.3.8
SQLite 3.19.3.0
ZLib 1.2.11

Signature
---------

subversion-1.9.10.zip:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=cNPU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Johan
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Subversion 1.9.10 up for testing/signing

Stefan Sperling-9
In reply to this post by Julian Foad-5
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 12:46:24PM +0000, Julian Foad wrote:
> The 1.9.10 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
>   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --

Summary: +1 to release

Tested: [bdb | fsfs] x [ra_local | ra_svn | ra_serf]
        swig bindings
        javahl bindings

Test results: All passed.

Applied r1850651 on top of tarball to avoid mod_dav_svn crash during tests.
This patch has been nominated for future releases. The crash is caused by
a very old bug and need not block this release.

Platform: OpenBSD 6.4 amd64

Dependencies:
bdb:        4.7.25
GNU-iconv:  1.15
apr:        1.5.2
apr-util:   1.5.4
httpd:      2.4.37
serf:       1.3.9
cyrus-sasl: 2.1.25
sqlite:     3160200
libssl:     LibreSSL 2.9.0
swig:       3.0.12
python:     2.7.13
perl:       5.24.3
ruby:       2.4.4
java:       1.8.0_172

Signatures:

subversion-1.9.10.tar.gz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEcBAABAgAGBQJcN2l1AAoJEE99uqmaWblzNe4H/2s5hh8kCC/wxf9bxR5iKM1p
136TxX5I0IuC4bgNEQJ+hBwPgjMlvCsIj9PeLH0EpAWLnL+UmUWIVAN9McCUfqDf
iBctoRqWyIabk7OPvvjbniBytX5IYYmzs35sN7IxTzDqTDPn4b6H8lCKxInPa4HC
b31AA8ua7Z+LFIa7TWT889MZfgsFod1cYOyEN/j7OqYzmXnt0r38/Hn79782eBGK
IOUTArVqr5bKAxCXgzEnfZRzNDyJq8Vhdzomt4NreYoO80MMnotLajnBrfXiWxTL
5TnTKAr1iCcoat/00lIleOOhtWMTUosOfy5XG1foi2epJ5S/GQ383o3oXSPZpZI=
=4eFX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

subversion-1.9.10.tar.bz2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEcBAABAgAGBQJcN2l+AAoJEE99uqmaWblzo9kIALOmryf3R66ew7VKG3XY7K+p
JlrhWx8ZghrJjQEOphCGgxE/FSyG067mNkS9voPfh5bK970ggD7D1jqUwYsmCrpr
EMkvbdi7S4V/nak19J1ZuoJMW3C/qdSjtlAu7afNXOGZ7tjRBBGY+sHpQlXxtNv0
a7RDvaZ7P/atgCVlhf+YDL54dXQY/d3b9tci2tgC9w9fdLmlJpc08AQCtwlZ7Y/G
DtXylWQDNyX6U8RH7t+mFRVScpa1qAi82eDqt1T8XO+b/GyEReZDCCutLgZGUsGY
AFtNHlKqFleOwI2SnraWfiEFlWg/T0daorbWeIBSlNcpy5loSNSBDm/QGDPrq54=
=bJ4C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Subversion 1.9.10 up for testing/signing

Troy Curtis Jr-2
In reply to this post by Julian Foad-5


On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 7:46 AM Julian Foad <[hidden email]> wrote:
The 1.9.10 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
Please get the tarballs from
  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
and add your signatures there.

Thanks!


Summary: +1 to release

Tested: [bdb | fsfs] x [ra_local | ra_svn | ra_serf]
        swig bindings
        javahl bindings

Tests fail for me with ctypes-python, but since I don't see ctypes-python listed as verified in the other email, I presume this is a known issue?

Test results: All passed.

Platform:
Fedora 29 x86_64
GCC 8.2.1 20181215

Dependencies:
bdb:        5.3.28
apr:        1.6.5
apr-util:   1.6.1-8
httpd:      2.4.37
serf:       1.3.9
cyrus-sasl: 2.1.27
sqlite:     3.26.0
libssl:     1.1.1
swig:      3.0.12
python:    2.7.15
perl:        5.28.1
ruby:       2.5.3
java:       java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.111

Signatures:
 
subversion-1.9.10.tar.bz2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=YtYi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

subversion-1.9.10.tar.gz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=JRb2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Troy

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Subversion 1.9.10 up for testing/signing

Julian Foad-5
Troy Curtis Jr wrote:
> Summary: +1 to release
>
> Tested: [bdb | fsfs] x [ra_local | ra_svn | ra_serf]
>          swig bindings
>          javahl bindings
>
> Tests fail for me with ctypes-python, but since I don't see ctypes-python listed as verified in the other email, I presume this is a known issue?

I don't think that's known. Please could you send the details. In rolling the tarballs, I tested ctypes-python and it passed on my system.

- Julian