Re: svn commit: r1809769 - in /subversion/branches/mod-dav-svn-expressions: ./ build/ build/ac-macros/ build/generator/ build/generator/templates/ build/win32/ contrib/client-side/ contrib/client-side/svnmerge/ contrib/hook-scripts/ contrib/server-side/ co...

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: svn commit: r1809769 - in /subversion/branches/mod-dav-svn-expressions: ./ build/ build/ac-macros/ build/generator/ build/generator/templates/ build/win32/ contrib/client-side/ contrib/client-side/svnmerge/ contrib/hook-scripts/ contrib/server-side/ co...

Branko Čibej
On 26.09.2017 20:18, [hidden email] wrote:

> Author: brane
> Date: Tue Sep 26 18:17:51 2017
> New Revision: 1809769
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1809769&view=rev
> Log:
> On the mod-dav-svn-expressions branch: Sync with trunk up to r1809768.
>
>
> [This commit notification would consist of 99 parts,
> which exceeds the limit of 50 ones, so it was shortened to the summary.]

Apropos of neither here nor there: do we want to include this feature in
1.10? If so, it needs some love; the code itself needs a couple
coding-style improvements and there are at least two bits that can be
factored into a helper function, and of course we'd have to add docs to
the site.

Mail thread link is in BRANCH-README.

-- Brane
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: svn commit: r1809769 - in /subversion/branches/mod-dav-svn-expressions: ./ build/ build/ac-macros/ build/generator/ build/generator/templates/ build/win32/ contrib/client-side/ contrib/client-side/svnmerge/ contrib/hook-scripts/ contrib/server-side/ co...

Branko Čibej
On 26.09.2017 20:40, Branko Čibej wrote:

> On 26.09.2017 20:18, [hidden email] wrote:
>> Author: brane
>> Date: Tue Sep 26 18:17:51 2017
>> New Revision: 1809769
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1809769&view=rev
>> Log:
>> On the mod-dav-svn-expressions branch: Sync with trunk up to r1809768.
>>
>>
>> [This commit notification would consist of 99 parts,
>> which exceeds the limit of 50 ones, so it was shortened to the summary.]
> Apropos of neither here nor there: do we want to include this feature in
> 1.10? If so, it needs some love; the code itself needs a couple
> coding-style improvements and there are at least two bits that can be
> factored into a helper function, and of course we'd have to add docs to
> the site.
>
> Mail thread link is in BRANCH-README.


After r1809783, "all" we need is tests and documentation.

-- Brane