> Nathan Hartman wrote:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SVN-1722 "svn
> > diff may missreport a revision as the working copy."
> Errm... last reviewed 9 years ago. Is it really what it says it is?
> Sadly, we have hundreds of unreviewed (or not recently reviewed) open
> issues. Some are misleadingly labeled "bite-sized" but are really
> symptoms of deeper problems. Can we take this opportunity to do
> something about that? Like, maybe start bringing one old issue to the
> dev list for review each week?
I'll be happy to do that.
I like the idea of tackling one a week because that is manageable and
allows developers and interested parties enough time to look at the
issue and give their opinions.
SVN-1722 can be the first one. I'll start looking into it myself a
little later today.